by Dan-N on October 1, 2009

Sometimes the more you learn about our government agencies, the scarier it gets. It turns out that the FDA Commissioner in 1994, David Kessler, was so unhappy with the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) that for 10 years he told his staff not to enforce the laws!
Let’s Back Up – What is DSHEA?
In 1994 Congress passed the Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act (DSHEA). You can read all about DSHEA in our post here. Basically DSHEA was an act passed by congress that allowed dietary supplements to remain on the market, at a time when FDA Commissioner Kessler wanted to ban basically all dietary supplements.
Due to a very strong grassroots movement and the climate of a political election in 1994, DSHEA was passed and supplements were allowed to be sold, under the guidelines of DSHEA.
Don’t Like A Law? Close Your Eyes and Wish it Away
Commissioner Kessler thought that DSHEA was a terrible law and figured if his agency did not enforce it, the rest of the world would also see what a terrible law it was. So, for almost a full decade, the FDA did not enforce DSHEA, in hopes that Congress would enact new legislation when they saw that DSHEA was not “working”.
“Kessler was so infuriated by the enactment of DSHEA, however, that he ordered FDA not to enforce the new law. Initially, this was not widely understood. As time has gone on, however, former FDA enforcement officials have admitted that, for the first full decade under DSHEA, FDA took virtually no enforcement action because of Kessler’s policy. Kessler was convinced if the law was not enforced and the worst elements of the dietary supplement industry were allowed to run wild, Congress would repeal the law. Of course, that did not occur. For a full decade, however, Kessler sacrificed protection of the public health to his own personal animosity toward DSHEA.”
- The History and Future of DSHEA – 9/21/09, Natural Produts Insider
Is it Just Us or Is This Just Flat Out Appalling ??
If Peter Barton Hutt, the author of the above article, got this all right – it is appalling. Imagine the uproar if a cop on the street decided he did not believe in Miranda rights, so he did not read anyone their rights. Now imagine it was not just a cop on the street, but the Police Commissioner who decided no one should be read their Miranda rights because he disagreed with the law. This would be completely unacceptable.
I think our nation works best when we enforce all the laws equally, not just the ones we like. Kessler’s plan almost worked – for years after DSHEA people said the supplement industry was unregulated and unsafe. There were calls for new laws and new regulations. In the end, DSHEA provided the regulations and laws – little did we know that the problem was just that the FDA had decided not to enforce the laws for personal reasons.
Additional Resources:
The History and Future of DSHEA – 9/21/09, Natural Produts Insider
What is A Dietary Supplement Anyway?
by Dan-N on July 29, 2009
Spend any time online looking at bodybuilding supplements and you will see plenty of supplements promising “steroid like results”. How do these supplements product muscle building results similar to steroids? Simple, they illegally use steroids in their supplements!
The FDA Issues a Warning on Steroid Like Supplements
On July 28th, 2009 the FDA issued a warning to consumers…
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a public health advisory warning consumers to stop using any body building products that are represented to contain steroids or steroid-like substances. Many of these products are marketed as dietary supplements.
This advisory was issued along with a warning letter sent to American Cellular Laboratories Inc. for marketing and distributing body building products containing synthetic steroid substances. Although these products are marketed as dietary supplements, they are NOT dietary supplements, but instead are unapproved and misbranded drugs.
The specific supplements mentioned by the FDA were:
- TREN-Xtreme: 19-Norandrosta-4,9-diene-3,17 dione, marketed as “similar to Trenbolone”
- MASS Xtreme: 17α-methyl-etioallocholan-2-ene-17b-ol, marketed as “similar to Methyl Testosterone”
- ESTRO Xtreme: 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA)
- AH-89-Xtreme: 5α-androstano[3,2-c]pyrazole-3-one-17β-ol-THP-ether, marketed as “similar to Stanozolol”
- HMG Xtreme: 2α,3α-epithio-17α-methyl-17β-hydroxy-5α-etioallocholane
- MMA-3 Xtreme: Androsta-1,4-dien-3,17-dione, marketed as “similar to Boldenone (Equipoise)”
- VNS-9 Xtreme: 17α-methyl-4-chloro-androsta-1,4-diene-3β,17β-diol, marketed as “similar to Turinabol”
- TT-40-Xtreme: 1-androsterone, marketed as “very similar to 1-Testosterone” and “converts to 1-Testosterone”
For More Information:
FDA Issues Warning on Steroid Like Supplements
Related Articles:
FDA Says Cheerios are a Drug
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) really does want to protect consumers from deceptive advertising, but sometimes it seems like their laws have an opposite effect. This summer, the government agency will issue new advertising guidelines requiring bloggers to disclose when they’re writing about a sponsor’s product and voicing opinions that aren’t their own.
“If you walk into a department store, you know the (sales) clerk is a clerk. Online, if you think that somebody is providing you with independent advice and … they have an economic motive for what they’re saying, that’s information a consumer should know.”
-Rich Cleland , Assistant Director of Advertising Practices for the FTC
by admin on June 10, 2009
Image via Wikipedia
Okay, we can’t lie to you – we need to tell you right from the start – this a boring post! Simply put, anytime you start quoting the FDA – your eyelids get heavy, drool starts running down your mouth and before you know it….
Close, I almost dosed off writing this post. While it may not be the most interesting topic, does seem like a good idea to define Dietary Supplements since that is what this site is about. Okay FDA take it away…
[click to continue…]